Pfizer Vaccines with Oncogenic SV40 DNA Contamination Not Revealed to FDA

Looks Like it Does Puts the TURBO in Turbo Cancers!

IMAGE 1. That Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines (gene therapy shots) Have an Undisclosed Oncogenic SV40 Promoter Sequence (along with a nuclear localization signal) was NOT Disclosed to the FDA or YOU. (see McKERNAN K et al, preprint April 10, 2023)

When I was injected with the Pfizer shot (twice), no one mentioned to me that some oncogenic contaminants were there. Had I known I would not have taken the shot but there really wasn’t any true informed consent, now was there. I have written and provided oodles of evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines were not safe nor effective on this substack and still aren’t.

I wrote a “unified theory of cancer” [1] and published this in 1994 (almost 30 years ago) arguing the malignant nature of a tumor was a phenotype and not genetically determined. This is because it relates to the alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) produced by the tumor or the immunosuppressed macrophages (actually it is immunosuppression and proinflammatory = immunosenescence). This meant that chemotherapy or radiation therapy (the slash and burn approach) wasn’t really necessary or even useful. All you had to do, aside from adopting a more healthy lifestyle was to use AFP antagonists which would simultaneously revert the malignant tumor to benign and restore the function of your macrophages.

As an update by 2015 [2] I had published a new immunosenescence paradigm of macrophages, whereby using AFP antagonists could not only restore wellness from tumors and infectious diseases but incredibly also many if not most chronic diseases (WOW!).

I am very, very pleased to say that in the past few days, a revered oncologist from the University of Alberta - Cross Cancer Institute in Edmonton, Alberta (where I did my Ph.D. in tumor oncology and studied molecular mechanisms of the ataxia telangiectasia cancer pre—disposition in which AFP seems to play a major role in advanced aging, poor immunity and yes, where there is an increased risk of cancer) has proposed the recommendation that IVERMECTIN could and should be investigated for cancer treatment.

IVERMECTIN and CANCER, it has at least 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action. Can Ivermectin Treat COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers? - 9 Ivermectin papers reviewed

Note that I had published in 2021, that ivermectin seems to be an AFP antagonist [3]!

Here is how Dr. William Makis worded his opinion:

Being somewhat concerned about the notion of turbo cancers caused by vaccination and/or COVID-19 infections, I wanted to search VAERS data to see if I could come up with some evidence one way or another. Now I am not a Dr. Jessica Rose, so I just went to ‘wonder.cdc.gov’ and used their search engines for lay people. I have to say that I know all the VAERS data is not there in wonderland, but at least it could give us an idea of whether other vaccines (lacking the oncogenic SV40 promoter and nuclear localization signal) have less oomph than the Pfizer shots for causing turbo cancers.

Guess what I found?

First, the term ‘neoplasm progression’ or ‘malignant neoplasm progression’ is very rarely used to describe a vaccine side effect (see below).

IMAGE 2. Only 158 cases involving the term ‘Neoplasm progression’ or ‘Malignant Neoplasm Progression’ in about 2,526,994 cases in the wonder.cdc.gov database (VAERs like database).

Note that COVID-19 vaccines win first prize for the most number of cases with adverse effects of vaccination involving about 1,557,402 cases of 2,526,994 cases or about 61.6% of the total adverse event cases in VAERs.

So to make a long story short, here is my analysis of how much oncogenic power does the Pfizer vaccine have over Moderna???

First what dose is most commonly implicated?

Image 3. Pfizer TURBO Power by Dose: Most Common Association with Cancer Progression is …Dose 2.

What dose gives the highest Case Fatality Rate?

Image 4. The Second Dose Does.

Maybe this is because there is some influence of the IgG1/3 spike antibodies and the induction of immunosenescence (loss of macrophage trained innate immunity) associated with 2 doses (spike protein and/or the LNP vectors). The improvement with the 3rd dose (lower n and lower CFR) implies that perhaps 50% of the pathological harm is from damage to the immune system macrophages (ie., INNATE immunity).

Note Moderna was 6 deaths in 14 cases for 42.9% CFR.

And how much TURBO (faster progression to death) is there in the Pfizer vaccinated compared to Moderna?

Image 5. Pfizer Vaccinees May Exhibit 3-fold the Turbo Power of the Moderna Vaccinees for Cancer Progression

In about 10/33 cases (30%) informative for the dates for the administration of the last vaccine dose and the date of death, these dates had the same month meaning less than 30 days from vaccination to death. About 20 of the 33 cases died within 2 months (about 76%).

This is to me absolutely shocking!

For the cases with the non-COVID-19 vaccines used for comparison, most likely these cases also got the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine so the resulting time to death seems to be intermediate between Pfizer and Moderna.

And the CDC and FDA say there is no vaccine-vaccine interaction: go ahead get all your 3 fall vaccines on the same day!!! Heck take the 3 above and the RSV along with your COVID-19 shot. When you take them all at once, nobody can tell which vaccine caused the damage!

Because the fall vaccines are to newer variants, it may mean for those who take the plunge (literally), the issue of the pathogenesis of the second vaccine dose by antibody dependent enhancement of infection into the protector macrophages will resurface. However since even other vaccines can behave like dose one, when you get your single “booster” it will likely be more like the two doses [4]… and thus dangerous by increasing the spike specific antibodies.

WE don’t know if Pfizer plans to keep the ONCOGENIC SV40 promoter in the fall vaccines. Do you think Health Canada’s lot release program will shed some light on this? Did you know that the manufacturer has to submit lots for lot release for all biologics on the market? This may be why Canada suffers fewer lots with contaminants like the heparin recall a few years back.

I guess the good news is if you haven’t dropped dead after the second dose of mRNA vaccine by now, then as long as you stay away from all vaccines, you should be good. Don’t forget to take your AFP antagonists daily: Vitamin D3 at 5000 to 10,000 IUs daily with K2; zinc at about 25 mg daily and 60 mg isoflavones daily. If you get into trouble, reach for ivermectin [3] and don’t forget the nasal and throat washes to lower the viral loads when encountering sick people around you.

REFERENCES

 

1. Laderoute MP. A new perspective on the nature of the cancer problem: anti-cellular senescence. Mol Carcinog. 1994 Jul;10(3):125-33. doi: 10.1002/mc.2940100303.

2. Laderoute MP. A new paradigm about HERV-K102 particle production and blocked release to explain cortisol mediated immunosenescence and age-associated risk of chronic disease. Discov Med. 2015 Dec;20(112):379-91. 

3. Laderoute M. Ivermectin may prevent and reverse immunosenescence by antagonizing alpha-fetoprotein and downmodulating PI3K/Akt/mTOR hyperactivity. Open Heart. April 29, 2021. https://openheart.bmj.com/content/8/1/e001655.responses#ivermectin-may-prevent-and-reverse-immunosenescence-by-antagonizing-alpha-fetoprotein-and-downmodulating-pi3k-akt-mtor-hyperactivity.

4. Claus J, Ten Doesschate T, Gumbs C, et al. BCG Vaccination of health care workers does not reduce SARS-COV-2 infections nor infection severity or duration: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. mBio. 2023 Apr 25;14(2):e0035623. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00356-23.