The Shocking Truth About COVID-19 Vaccines
Based on 'REAL' DATA From UK ONS Released July 6, 2022
Synopsis: For reasons that are not immediately clear, many public health authorities continue to recommend the latest round of COVID-19 vaccine boosters, despite the growing evidence for serious harm, deaths, and lack of effectiveness. Most disconcerting is the recent addition of the gene therapy mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to the childhood schedule. As a bit of encouraging news, is that internationally some public health authorities now recommend against the use of these deadly vaccines at least in certain age groups. In this chapter being written for a new book on the COVID-19 pandemic on what went wrong, the ulterior motive behind the use of the mRNA gene therapy technology platform for vaccines will be discussed. The shocking revelation that adaptive immunity vaccines producing antibodies that targeted the spike protein were doomed to failure from the beginning, may be news to many. This is because emerging pathogens exhibit the well-known phenomenon of antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection in macrophages along with the selection of immune escape variants. This explains increased transmission and severity rates in the vaccinated over the unvaccinated with the emergence of variants. The technical differences between adaptive and ‘trained (innate) immunity’ and the clear superiority of innate immunity for establishing herd immunity and ending pandemics will be highlighted. Data from the UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) released July 6, 2022 will also be provided to counteract the lies and myths promulgated to falsely coerce people into taking one or more vaccine doses. Most notably however the ONS data provides irrefutable evidence that the COVID-19 mass vaccination campaign should have been globally halted by the first week in February 2021. The safe and effective natural solution to reducing the severity and mortality of COVID-19 disease offered by Mother Nature will be examined and contrasted with the problematic and dangerous adaptive immunity COVID-19 vaccines. It is no surprise that the approach by Mother Nature promotes trained (innate) immunity over adaptive where the former involves HERV-K102 particle production in proinflammatory foamy macrophages. HERV-K102 is a novel, virus anti-virus protection system unique to humans recently proposed as the crucial correlate of protection against pandemic RNA viruses [Laderoute M, submitted]. Lessons learned from the COVID-19 vaccine debacle will better prepare us for future pandemics provided legal steps are taken to reduce the capture of public health authorities by the bio-pharmaceutical complex. These steps at a minimum should include: repealing the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 in the USA; abolishing the existence of vaccine schedules; cancelling the fee for service for vaccine and drug regulatory approvals; the discontinuation of the advertising of drugs or vaccines on television and social media in the USA; mandatory autopsies for hospital deaths involving emergency use authorized medical interventions, mandatory placebo control groups for the evaluation of medicines and vaccines, implementation of the all-cause mortality evaluation for the approval of medicines and vaccines where applicable including as a minimum evaluation at two years, and through amendments to the constitution, banning the use of vaccine mandates, as well as specifically outlawing the ability of hospitals or organizations rather than the individual to decide on medical interventions in consultation with their health care professionals.
What would you prioritize as recommendations to prevent future pandemic vaccine debacles?
HERE is a pdf version for sharing.
I agree that Omicron was "the free range vaccine" as I called it, but what has puzzled me is that Omicron's most recent common ancestor with any of the prior strains of COVID had to be no later than early 2018, so it may also have been a lab-virus. https://theethicalskeptic.com/2021/11/15/chinas-ccp-concealed-sars-cov-2-presence-in-china-as-far-back-as-march-2018/
Omicron took the wind out of the sails of the fear of death, but it also gave new legs to more rounds of transmissibility.
Was this "friendly" or "adversarial" lab-action?
I lean towards "friendly", but who released Omicron? What is the interest of whoever released it?